Household investors amplify the 52-week high anomaly through their trading behavior. Using daily household and institutional trading data, we show that households sharply increase their selling — particularly with limit orders — at the 52-week high price. This uninformed selling at a psychological price milestone leads to a doubling of unconditional 52-week-high anomaly returns, with institutions serving as the profitable counterparty.
DV-PMI · Research program
Research
Three working papers form the basis for the DV-PMI dashboard. Paper 1 establishes that trading skill in prediction markets is two-dimensional and that execution, not forecasting, determines who profits. Paper 2 builds an event-level detection test for episodic informed trading, calibrated on a real-data placebo and validated against a public enforcement action. Paper 4 (with Andrew Grant) extracts probability weighting from on-chain trades. Earlier peer-reviewed work spans behavioral finance, microstructure, and momentum.
Full abstracts on SSRN · citations on Google Scholar
DV-PMI program
The three working papers behind the indices on this site.
Retail traders pick winners yet lose money. In 222 million Polymarket trades, profit reflects two nearly independent skills; execution, not forecasting, determines who profits. Terminal-payoff identification removes the benchmark contamination biasing conventional decompositions. Automated traders at coin-flip accuracy (49.9%) earn the only positive return, $133 million; more accurate retail (51.3%) lose $79 million. The negative cross-skill correlation those decompositions report is the contamination; the bias derived in the paper matches the empirical estimate to within one percent. Orthogonality appears in 14.1 million CBOE options; the inversion does not. Retail traders lose not because they are wrong, but because they are late.
Trader-aggregated statistics cannot identify episodic informed trading: pooled averages dilute the signal, and the best-episode rule inflates with activity at the extreme-value rate. Identification requires the trader-event unit. We construct a per-event joint-accuracy test with multiplicity correction across a trader's events and calibrate its false-positive rate on a real-data placebo class where episodic private information is implausible — the corrected test yields zero discoveries at every threshold. Applied to the full Polymarket history (237 million resolved trades), the test shows statistical patterns consistent with informed trading for the trader charged in CFTC v. Spagnuolo (2026), where every trader-aggregated statistic does not.
Prediction markets provide a model-free measurement of probability weighting: the price-probability gap in binary contracts is the Prelec weighting function, with no need to specify utility, estimate physical density, or extract risk-neutral density. Pooled across 233M Polymarket non-bot trades the fit is α = 0.664 (R² = 0.987), matching the Tversky-Kahneman (1992) experimental estimate of 0.65 to within standard error. We then test whether the dashboard's weekly prediction-market-implied weighting index predicts cross-sectional equity anomalies (lottery premium, IVOL spread, beta spread) and JKP factor returns.
Peer-reviewed publications
Cross-sectional momentum is conventionally attributed to slow-moving institutional capital. Using investor-class flow data we show the opposite: households are the trend-followers buying recent winners, while institutions are the contrarians providing liquidity to those flows. The role reversal helps reconcile competing behavioral and intermediary-based explanations for the momentum premium.
We identify financial uncertainty — the unforecastable component of multiple financial indicators — as the primary driver of cryptocurrency return premia. Coins with greater exposure to financial uncertainty earn higher subsequent returns; this premium is distinct from macro, real, and policy uncertainty, and is not captured by VIX alone. Portfolio analysis yields a financial uncertainty premium of approximately 21% per year.
We examine how equity borrowing constraints shape informed short-selling behavior. When borrowing constraints are tighter, informed short sellers concentrate their activity in unusually large trades: the most return-predictive short sales are predominantly large short sales in stocks with higher borrowing constraints. The result suggests that constraints lead informed investors to trade more aggressively rather than withdraw.
Reverse innovation originates when products are first developed in emerging economies before diffusing to advanced economies. Using structural equation modeling and qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), we examine the antecedents and configurations that enable reverse innovation, finding that value-chain co-creation between parent firm and subsidiary is a key condition for successful reversal.
Other working papers
The disposition effect requires a reference price to classify a position as a gain or a loss, and for multi-purchase positions the literature defaults to the volume-weighted average price (VWAP). Using population-level data on household investors, we show the relevant reference depends on how the position was built: investors who buy below their running cost anchor on the last purchase price, while investors who buy above anchor on the VWAP, consistent with Thaler's hedonic editing. The correction reverses two canonical findings: VWAP masks a 249-basis-point welfare cost, and experienced investors retain rather than shed their bias.
How does investor agreement at the 52-week high affect market quality? Using social media sentiment, intraday TAQ data, and investor-class order flows for all S&P 500 stocks, we document consensus: both retail and institutional investors predominantly sell at the 52-week high. The consensus tightens spreads by 15 basis points and increases sell-side liquidity by 16%, while informed trading falls by 30%. The high creates a liquidity barrier that reduces subsequent five-day returns by 30 basis points, challenging the conventional wisdom that high liquidity universally improves market quality.
Manufacturing firms face substantial losses from rare supplier quality failures, yet lack accessible tools to predict them. We develop a four-stage AI pipeline that integrates large language models into machine learning workflows, automating feature engineering from raw supplier data, unsupervised risk segmentation, ensemble model configuration for imbalanced prediction, and interpretability analysis with actionable recommendations. Validation on 622,924 aerospace transactions with class imbalance up to 139:1 shows significant improvements in F1, ROC-AUC, and PR-AUC over manual approaches, enabling organizations without data science expertise to deploy predictive supplier risk detection.
Cities differ in their openness to adopting new innovative products, and that variation shapes local firm value creation. We construct a proxy for city-level openness from the likelihood that new music is first played by local radio stations. Openness exhibits persistent cross-sectional variation across U.S. cities traceable more than a century, and during 2000 to 2019 it explains variation in the success of new ventures and new product introductions.